<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 681 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the original authority for reconsideration. It emphasized the misapplication of judgments, the necessity to determine if ship breaking constitutes manufacturing, and the interpretation of the exemption notification for Ocean-going vessels. The decision underscores the importance of a comprehensive analysis of legal principles and precedents in resolving disputes concerning customs duties and exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:31:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 681 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the original authority for reconsideration. It emphasized the misapplication of judgments, the necessity to determine if ship breaking constitutes manufacturing, and the interpretation of the exemption notification for Ocean-going vessels. The decision underscores the importance of a comprehensive analysis of legal principles and precedents in resolving disputes concerning customs duties and exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>