https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98815 A shareholders' resolution at an extraordinary general meeting remained valid where the temporary chairman could not treat the meeting as dissolved and the appointment stayed within the notice. The suit was barred by section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 to the extent it enforced contractual rights on behalf of an unregistered firm. A pre-incorporation agreement did not bind the company, and the memorandum and articles created no independent enforceable liability for the named persons. However, the plaintiffs were entitled to a decree for the admitted and severable sum, which could be granted under Order 12, Rule 6 CPC despite other disputes. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:24:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98815 A shareholders' resolution at an extraordinary general meeting remained valid where the temporary chairman could not treat the meeting as dissolved and the appointment stayed within the notice. The suit was barred by section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 to the extent it enforced contractual rights on behalf of an unregistered firm. A pre-incorporation agreement did not bind the company, and the memorandum and articles created no independent enforceable liability for the named persons. However, the plaintiffs were entitled to a decree for the admitted and severable sum, which could be granted under Order 12, Rule 6 CPC despite other disputes. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 19 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98815