https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98802 The court held that obtaining leave from the company court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, is necessary to initiate proceedings under Order 8-A of the Civil Procedure Code against a company in liquidation. The court clarified that the term "other legal proceeding" in Section 446(1) includes interlocutory applications and defensive claims, requiring leave from the company court. The court emphasized the objective of Section 446 to prevent litigations against a company in liquidation without the court's permission. The petitioners' application under Order 8-A was rejected, and the civil revision petition was dismissed without costs. en-us Mon, 21 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:01:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98802 The court held that obtaining leave from the company court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, is necessary to initiate proceedings under Order 8-A of the Civil Procedure Code against a company in liquidation. The court clarified that the term "other legal proceeding" in Section 446(1) includes interlocutory applications and defensive claims, requiring leave from the company court. The court emphasized the objective of Section 446 to prevent litigations against a company in liquidation without the court's permission. The petitioners' application under Order 8-A was rejected, and the civil revision petition was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 21 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98802