<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (12) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98799</link>
    <description>A person whose proprietary rights are directly affected by a winding-up order may invoke the statutory appeal under Section 483 even if no notice was issued and she did not appear before the company judge. The commentary also states that proceedings under Section 457 and Rule 103 require notice and an opportunity of hearing where proposed directions may prejudice such rights, and that an order for sale of leasehold rights affecting a non-party&#039;s property cannot be made without compliance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (12) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98799</link>
      <description>A person whose proprietary rights are directly affected by a winding-up order may invoke the statutory appeal under Section 483 even if no notice was issued and she did not appear before the company judge. The commentary also states that proceedings under Section 457 and Rule 103 require notice and an opportunity of hearing where proposed directions may prejudice such rights, and that an order for sale of leasehold rights affecting a non-party&#039;s property cannot be made without compliance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>