<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (11) TMI 57 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98797</link>
    <description>A declaration of solvency in a members&#039; voluntary winding up is not invalid merely because the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities later proves to contain an omission or error. The court construed the statutory phrase in context and held that section 283(2)(b) does not demand absolute perfection or complete accuracy; it is sufficient if the statement is fairly and reasonably describable as one of assets and liabilities. That interpretation was supported by the surrounding winding-up provisions, the liquidator&#039;s duties if insolvency emerges, the prescribed form of the declaration, and the penal consequences that would follow a rigid reading. The claim based on alleged omission of a material liability therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (11) TMI 57 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98797</link>
      <description>A declaration of solvency in a members&#039; voluntary winding up is not invalid merely because the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities later proves to contain an omission or error. The court construed the statutory phrase in context and held that section 283(2)(b) does not demand absolute perfection or complete accuracy; it is sufficient if the statement is fairly and reasonably describable as one of assets and liabilities. That interpretation was supported by the surrounding winding-up provisions, the liquidator&#039;s duties if insolvency emerges, the prescribed form of the declaration, and the penal consequences that would follow a rigid reading. The claim based on alleged omission of a material liability therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>