<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 536 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing that procedural limitations should not negate the substantive right of refund, particularly when the sale of goods precedes the determination of cash discounts. The case was remanded to the original authority for a thorough review based on established legal principles and previous Tribunal decisions, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:53:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 536 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing that procedural limitations should not negate the substantive right of refund, particularly when the sale of goods precedes the determination of cash discounts. The case was remanded to the original authority for a thorough review based on established legal principles and previous Tribunal decisions, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>