<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 655 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98781</link>
    <description>Personal gold ornaments carried on the body by a college student returning from the UAE were considered in light of their quantity and surrounding circumstances. Undeclared gold does not automatically justify confiscation; the applicable law and rules require assessment of whether the facts establish an attempt to smuggle. Where the quantity and circumstances are inconsistent with smuggling, confiscation, redemption fine and personal penalty are unjustified and must be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:22:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 655 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98781</link>
      <description>Personal gold ornaments carried on the body by a college student returning from the UAE were considered in light of their quantity and surrounding circumstances. Undeclared gold does not automatically justify confiscation; the applicable law and rules require assessment of whether the facts establish an attempt to smuggle. Where the quantity and circumstances are inconsistent with smuggling, confiscation, redemption fine and personal penalty are unjustified and must be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>