<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (2) TMI 29 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98776</link>
    <description>Bihar sales tax law was upheld as operating on the completed sale itself, while a deeming provision merely fixed the territorial situs of that sale where the goods were in Bihar at the contract date or were manufactured there. The levy was treated as a tax on sale of goods, not an excise duty, because liability arose on sale and not on manufacture or production. The Court also accepted territorial nexus where Bihar had a real connecting link with the goods, and retrospective operation did not change the character of the tax or invalidate it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (2) TMI 29 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98776</link>
      <description>Bihar sales tax law was upheld as operating on the completed sale itself, while a deeming provision merely fixed the territorial situs of that sale where the goods were in Bihar at the contract date or were manufactured there. The levy was treated as a tax on sale of goods, not an excise duty, because liability arose on sale and not on manufacture or production. The Court also accepted territorial nexus where Bihar had a real connecting link with the goods, and retrospective operation did not change the character of the tax or invalidate it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>