<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (5) TMI 28 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98774</link>
    <description>An assessment under section 10(2)(b) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1944 must be a fair estimate based on relevant material and evidence, not a pure guess or bare suspicion. Rejecting the books of account does not permit the assessing authority to adopt an arbitrary turnover figure; best judgment assessment still requires some factual foundation, even though strict rules of evidence do not apply. The referred question was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (5) TMI 28 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98774</link>
      <description>An assessment under section 10(2)(b) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1944 must be a fair estimate based on relevant material and evidence, not a pure guess or bare suspicion. Rejecting the books of account does not permit the assessing authority to adopt an arbitrary turnover figure; best judgment assessment still requires some factual foundation, even though strict rules of evidence do not apply. The referred question was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>