<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (6) TMI 337 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98740</link>
    <description>Refund of reversed Modvat credit was considered in light of whether the assessee&#039;s entitlement had been properly examined and whether the special reversal scheme announced in January 1997 applied. The lower authorities had rejected the claim on the basis of alleged double benefit and lack of entitlement, but the record showed that material submissions on non-availability of countervailing duty, non-utilisation of the claimed credit, cancellation of DEEC particulars, conversion of the licence, and the special scheme were not examined. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh adjudication and a speaking order after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:08:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (6) TMI 337 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98740</link>
      <description>Refund of reversed Modvat credit was considered in light of whether the assessee&#039;s entitlement had been properly examined and whether the special reversal scheme announced in January 1997 applied. The lower authorities had rejected the claim on the basis of alleged double benefit and lack of entitlement, but the record showed that material submissions on non-availability of countervailing duty, non-utilisation of the claimed credit, cancellation of DEEC particulars, conversion of the licence, and the special scheme were not examined. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh adjudication and a speaking order after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>