<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (4) TMI 75 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98730</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions, ruling that Bokaro Steel Ltd. is not considered &quot;State&quot; under Article 12 of the Constitution. Consequently, the petitioners are not entitled to protections under Article 16, and no writ could be issued in their favor. The court did not address the enforceability of contractual rights or the rationality of the seniority lists in detail, as these issues were secondary and could prejudice ongoing litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (4) TMI 75 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98730</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions, ruling that Bokaro Steel Ltd. is not considered &quot;State&quot; under Article 12 of the Constitution. Consequently, the petitioners are not entitled to protections under Article 16, and no writ could be issued in their favor. The court did not address the enforceability of contractual rights or the rationality of the seniority lists in detail, as these issues were secondary and could prejudice ongoing litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>