<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (6) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98710</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition as the company was not conducting any business, rendering it unable to amend its memorandum of association to engage in new business ventures. The court emphasized the impracticality and absence of commercial rationale behind the proposed alterations. The petitioner was directed to cover the costs of the Registrar of Companies, with no ruling on the landlord&#039;s costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:01:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (6) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98710</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition as the company was not conducting any business, rendering it unable to amend its memorandum of association to engage in new business ventures. The court emphasized the impracticality and absence of commercial rationale behind the proposed alterations. The petitioner was directed to cover the costs of the Registrar of Companies, with no ruling on the landlord&#039;s costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>