https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98700 An order directing advertisement of a winding-up petition was treated as appealable under section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956, following prior authority recognising appealability under the corresponding earlier companies law. The objection to maintainability therefore failed. The appellate Bench of the High Court was not competent to summarily dismiss the appeal because Rule 966A of the Bombay High Court Rules limited summary admission to specified categories, and this appeal did not fall within them; it had to be heard and decided on merits. The summary dismissal was set aside and the matter remitted for decision in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Aug 2014 09:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98700 An order directing advertisement of a winding-up petition was treated as appealable under section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956, following prior authority recognising appealability under the corresponding earlier companies law. The objection to maintainability therefore failed. The appellate Bench of the High Court was not competent to summarily dismiss the appeal because Rule 966A of the Bombay High Court Rules limited summary admission to specified categories, and this appeal did not fall within them; it had to be heard and decided on merits. The summary dismissal was set aside and the matter remitted for decision in accordance with law. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 05 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98700