<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (10) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98683</link>
    <description>The Andhra Pradesh High Court&#039;s Division Bench set aside the single judge&#039;s order and directed a fresh sale of company assets, emphasizing the importance of adequate publicity, judicial discretion, and compliance with Rule 273. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, dismissing appeals and stressing the need for a reasonable price reflective of market value, with a minimum bid set at Rs. 10,00,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (10) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98683</link>
      <description>The Andhra Pradesh High Court&#039;s Division Bench set aside the single judge&#039;s order and directed a fresh sale of company assets, emphasizing the importance of adequate publicity, judicial discretion, and compliance with Rule 273. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, dismissing appeals and stressing the need for a reasonable price reflective of market value, with a minimum bid set at Rs. 10,00,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>