https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98672 The appeal seeking rectification of the final order passed by the Tribunal was dismissed. The judge found no mistake of fact or law in the final order, which involved an amendment to the Import General Manifest. The judge noted the relationship between the appellants and the original consignee and upheld the Commissioner's discretion in allowing changes in the consignee's name. The judge determined that the cited cases were not applicable, and the final order did not cause legal injury to the appellants. Consequently, the rectification application was dismissed for lack of merit. en-us Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:41:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98672 The appeal seeking rectification of the final order passed by the Tribunal was dismissed. The judge found no mistake of fact or law in the final order, which involved an amendment to the Import General Manifest. The judge noted the relationship between the appellants and the original consignee and upheld the Commissioner's discretion in allowing changes in the consignee's name. The judge determined that the cited cases were not applicable, and the final order did not cause legal injury to the appellants. Consequently, the rectification application was dismissed for lack of merit. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 12 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98672