<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 475 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of packing should be included in the assessable value of Motor Cycles as they were delivered in a packed condition to the Depot for sale. Despite arguments that packing was for transportation safety, not marketability, the Tribunal emphasized the Supreme Court&#039;s test and distinguished previous cases. Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the previous decision and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:32:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 475 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of packing should be included in the assessable value of Motor Cycles as they were delivered in a packed condition to the Depot for sale. Despite arguments that packing was for transportation safety, not marketability, the Tribunal emphasized the Supreme Court&#039;s test and distinguished previous cases. Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the previous decision and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>