<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (7) TMI 60 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98665</link>
    <description>Section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 relieves an officer from liability for negligence, default, breach of duty, misfeasance or breach of trust when proceedings are apprehended or brought, but it does not extend to relieving a company from the statutory obligation to file returns. The petition seeking that relief was therefore misconceived and not maintainable. Because the petition itself was incompetent, amendment of the prayer was also refused, as it would effectively introduce a new petition into the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (7) TMI 60 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98665</link>
      <description>Section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 relieves an officer from liability for negligence, default, breach of duty, misfeasance or breach of trust when proceedings are apprehended or brought, but it does not extend to relieving a company from the statutory obligation to file returns. The petition seeking that relief was therefore misconceived and not maintainable. Because the petition itself was incompetent, amendment of the prayer was also refused, as it would effectively introduce a new petition into the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>