<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (4) TMI 60 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98637</link>
    <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh ruled that the moneys held by the liquidator in a special banking account during a company&#039;s liquidation did not constitute unpaid dividends under section 555(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. The court clarified that these funds, subject to disputes among heirs-at-law, were not considered dividends as they did not meet the criteria of being unpaid for six months. Consequently, the liquidator was permitted to continue his duties under section 512 without additional directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:31:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (4) TMI 60 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98637</link>
      <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh ruled that the moneys held by the liquidator in a special banking account during a company&#039;s liquidation did not constitute unpaid dividends under section 555(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. The court clarified that these funds, subject to disputes among heirs-at-law, were not considered dividends as they did not meet the criteria of being unpaid for six months. Consequently, the liquidator was permitted to continue his duties under section 512 without additional directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>