https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98636 Waiver of pre-deposit in a stay application was considered in light of the appellant's lack of a strong prima facie case and its admitted ineligibility for the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. during the relevant period, because it did not have a hot rolling mill. Financial hardship was also taken into account in fixing the extent of deposit. The appellants were required to deposit Rs. 50,000 within ten weeks; on compliance, the balance duty and entire penalty were waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal. Non-compliance would expose the appeal to dismissal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:28:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98636 Waiver of pre-deposit in a stay application was considered in light of the appellant's lack of a strong prima facie case and its admitted ineligibility for the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. during the relevant period, because it did not have a hot rolling mill. Financial hardship was also taken into account in fixing the extent of deposit. The appellants were required to deposit Rs. 50,000 within ten weeks; on compliance, the balance duty and entire penalty were waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal. Non-compliance would expose the appeal to dismissal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98636