<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 544 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98629</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act for his involvement in the recovery of smuggled goods. The penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced to Rs. 2.5 lakhs from the initial amount of Rs. 25 lakhs, considering his role as a Manager and the penalty adjustment made for the owner of the company. The appeal was dismissed except for the modification in the penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 544 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98629</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act for his involvement in the recovery of smuggled goods. The penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced to Rs. 2.5 lakhs from the initial amount of Rs. 25 lakhs, considering his role as a Manager and the penalty adjustment made for the owner of the company. The appeal was dismissed except for the modification in the penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>