https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98627 A members' meeting could not validly appoint a liquidator where only one member remained present, unless the governing statute or constitution clearly authorised a single-member meeting; the purported appointment was therefore a nullity. The text also states that, even if the appointment had been effective, the court could remove a liquidator for cause where independence was needed for the proper conduct of the winding up. Because the liquidation involved a serious family dispute and potential investigation into alleged misappropriation, the court favoured an independent office-holder. The stated result was that the challenge succeeded and the liquidation would proceed before an independent liquidator. en-us Mon, 24 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:21:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98627 A members' meeting could not validly appoint a liquidator where only one member remained present, unless the governing statute or constitution clearly authorised a single-member meeting; the purported appointment was therefore a nullity. The text also states that, even if the appointment had been effective, the court could remove a liquidator for cause where independence was needed for the proper conduct of the winding up. Because the liquidation involved a serious family dispute and potential investigation into alleged misappropriation, the court favoured an independent office-holder. The stated result was that the challenge succeeded and the liquidation would proceed before an independent liquidator. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 24 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98627