<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (3) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98624</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellants failed to prove any acts of mismanagement or oppression under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court concluded that the allegations lacked substance and were baseless, emphasizing the need for specific proof and not just sweeping allegations. The appellants were also directed to bear the costs of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:15:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (3) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98624</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellants failed to prove any acts of mismanagement or oppression under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court concluded that the allegations lacked substance and were baseless, emphasizing the need for specific proof and not just sweeping allegations. The appellants were also directed to bear the costs of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>