<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (2) TMI 103 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98621</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the impugned order was struck down due to the Central Government&#039;s refusal to disclose reasons for forming the opinion and failure to prove the existence of circumstances justifying the investigation. The court emphasized that existence of prima facie materials is necessary to justify the formation of an opinion under section 237(b) of the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:13:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (2) TMI 103 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98621</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the impugned order was struck down due to the Central Government&#039;s refusal to disclose reasons for forming the opinion and failure to prove the existence of circumstances justifying the investigation. The court emphasized that existence of prima facie materials is necessary to justify the formation of an opinion under section 237(b) of the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>