<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (2) TMI 100 - CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98616</link>
    <description>Post-winding-up rent is payable in full only where the liquidator retains the lease for the convenience of the winding up; rent attributable to that period ranks as an expense, while earlier rent remains merely provable. A dilapidations claim under repairing covenants was not converted into a liability payable in full by section 323 of the Companies Act, 1948, because a lease was not treated as a &quot;contract&quot; for that purpose, so the claim remained provable. A covenant to give full vacant possession did not survive an informal surrender of the lease where the obligation arose only on termination; the surrender extinguished that liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (2) TMI 100 - CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98616</link>
      <description>Post-winding-up rent is payable in full only where the liquidator retains the lease for the convenience of the winding up; rent attributable to that period ranks as an expense, while earlier rent remains merely provable. A dilapidations claim under repairing covenants was not converted into a liability payable in full by section 323 of the Companies Act, 1948, because a lease was not treated as a &quot;contract&quot; for that purpose, so the claim remained provable. A covenant to give full vacant possession did not survive an informal surrender of the lease where the obligation arose only on termination; the surrender extinguished that liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>