<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (12) TMI 74 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98615</link>
    <description>At the interlocutory stage, the SC upheld an injunction restraining a person from acting as a company director where the company records, share register and minutes prima facie showed that he was neither entered as a shareholder nor validly appointed by resolution. His de facto exercise of director functions did not override the legal entitlement to hold office, and an earlier order permitting operation of the bank account was treated as without prejudice and not as recognition of directorship. The court also noted the delayed attempt to seek rectification of the share register and drew an adverse inference from that delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (12) TMI 74 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98615</link>
      <description>At the interlocutory stage, the SC upheld an injunction restraining a person from acting as a company director where the company records, share register and minutes prima facie showed that he was neither entered as a shareholder nor validly appointed by resolution. His de facto exercise of director functions did not override the legal entitlement to hold office, and an earlier order permitting operation of the bank account was treated as without prejudice and not as recognition of directorship. The court also noted the delayed attempt to seek rectification of the share register and drew an adverse inference from that delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>