https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98592 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the respondent-company, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, is not considered a "State" or an "authority" under Article 12 of the Constitution. Consequently, the court found that writ jurisdiction was not applicable. The court also rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding the competence of the personnel officer, applicability of termination clauses, violation of standing orders, discrimination under Article 14, and jurisdiction of the High Court to issue writs against the respondent. No costs were awarded. en-us Sat, 29 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:34:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98592 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the respondent-company, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, is not considered a "State" or an "authority" under Article 12 of the Constitution. Consequently, the court found that writ jurisdiction was not applicable. The court also rejected the petitioner's arguments regarding the competence of the personnel officer, applicability of termination clauses, violation of standing orders, discrimination under Article 14, and jurisdiction of the High Court to issue writs against the respondent. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Sat, 29 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98592