https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98577 The Supreme Court set aside the Central Government's order appointing an inspector to investigate the appellant company, ruling that the Government's opinion was not based on relevant material and included irrelevant considerations. The Court emphasized that the power to appoint an inspector should be exercised reasonably and on demonstrable circumstances. The respondents were ordered to bear the costs of the appellant in both the Supreme Court and High Court. en-us Mon, 16 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Aug 2014 09:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98577 The Supreme Court set aside the Central Government's order appointing an inspector to investigate the appellant company, ruling that the Government's opinion was not based on relevant material and included irrelevant considerations. The Court emphasized that the power to appoint an inspector should be exercised reasonably and on demonstrable circumstances. The respondents were ordered to bear the costs of the appellant in both the Supreme Court and High Court. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 16 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98577