<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 496 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98554</link>
    <description>The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) allowed the appeals in a case involving the confiscation of seized silver and a scooter, as well as the imposition of personal penalties. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence and the benefit of doubt granted to the appellants due to discrepancies in statements and the absence of supporting technical opinions. The Commissioner emphasized the importance of proper documentation indicating legal acquisition of the silver, leading to the rejection of Revenue&#039;s appeals. The appellants successfully argued ownership of the silver, supported by valid documents, resulting in the Commissioner&#039;s ruling in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 496 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98554</link>
      <description>The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) allowed the appeals in a case involving the confiscation of seized silver and a scooter, as well as the imposition of personal penalties. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence and the benefit of doubt granted to the appellants due to discrepancies in statements and the absence of supporting technical opinions. The Commissioner emphasized the importance of proper documentation indicating legal acquisition of the silver, leading to the rejection of Revenue&#039;s appeals. The appellants successfully argued ownership of the silver, supported by valid documents, resulting in the Commissioner&#039;s ruling in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>