https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98546 The Patna High Court determined that it had jurisdiction to pass a decree against a company despite a winding-up order from the Bombay High Court. The court clarified that the decree was not automatically void but voidable at the liquidator's instance due to non-compliance with Section 446 of the Companies Act. It emphasized the necessity of obtaining court leave for legal actions against companies under winding-up. The court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the lower court's ruling on the decree's voidness and highlighting the need to seek orders from the winding-up court for the decree's executability against the company's assets. en-us Tue, 20 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:55:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98546 The Patna High Court determined that it had jurisdiction to pass a decree against a company despite a winding-up order from the Bombay High Court. The court clarified that the decree was not automatically void but voidable at the liquidator's instance due to non-compliance with Section 446 of the Companies Act. It emphasized the necessity of obtaining court leave for legal actions against companies under winding-up. The court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the lower court's ruling on the decree's voidness and highlighting the need to seek orders from the winding-up court for the decree's executability against the company's assets. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 20 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98546