https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98541 Confiscation of goods and rejection of the importer's claim were upheld because the record showed inconsistencies between the invoices produced by the appellant and the copies recovered from the transport premises. The claim of purchase from dealers at Surat was not supported by evidence sufficient to displace the factual findings in the impugned order, and no material was produced to controvert those findings. On that basis, the order was found to suffer from no infirmity and was left undisturbed. en-us Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:42:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98541 Confiscation of goods and rejection of the importer's claim were upheld because the record showed inconsistencies between the invoices produced by the appellant and the copies recovered from the transport premises. The claim of purchase from dealers at Surat was not supported by evidence sufficient to displace the factual findings in the impugned order, and no material was produced to controvert those findings. On that basis, the order was found to suffer from no infirmity and was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98541