<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (7) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98537</link>
    <description>Interrogatories in winding-up proceedings are confined by relevancy, propriety and fairness, and Order XI rules 6 and 7 must be read together: rule 6 addresses objections to particular questions, while rule 7 permits a broader challenge to the interrogatories as a whole. The article explains that winding-up matters are ordinarily decided on affidavit evidence, so expansive discovery into a company&#039;s business is not available as of right. Limited interrogatories may be permitted on specific matters where clarification is necessary, but oral evidence and summoning witnesses are generally unnecessary at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:29:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (7) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98537</link>
      <description>Interrogatories in winding-up proceedings are confined by relevancy, propriety and fairness, and Order XI rules 6 and 7 must be read together: rule 6 addresses objections to particular questions, while rule 7 permits a broader challenge to the interrogatories as a whole. The article explains that winding-up matters are ordinarily decided on affidavit evidence, so expansive discovery into a company&#039;s business is not available as of right. Limited interrogatories may be permitted on specific matters where clarification is necessary, but oral evidence and summoning witnesses are generally unnecessary at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>