<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 561 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98531</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order of confiscation and penalty imposed on M/s. Oceanic Shipping Agency Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. TISCO. The discrepancy in the number of M.S. Billets was attributed to varying lengths and weight differences, supported by evidence of corrective actions taken by the appellants. The Tribunal found that the unaccounted billets were not illegally imported, leading to the reversal of the initial decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:48:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 561 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98531</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order of confiscation and penalty imposed on M/s. Oceanic Shipping Agency Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. TISCO. The discrepancy in the number of M.S. Billets was attributed to varying lengths and weight differences, supported by evidence of corrective actions taken by the appellants. The Tribunal found that the unaccounted billets were not illegally imported, leading to the reversal of the initial decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>