<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (3) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98522</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the decision of the Companies Tribunal was set aside. Errors of law were found in the Tribunal&#039;s failure to recognize the effect of Section 164 of the Companies Act and its incorrect determination of continuous wrongs. The appellants were entitled to costs, and all interim orders were vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:36:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (3) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98522</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the decision of the Companies Tribunal was set aside. Errors of law were found in the Tribunal&#039;s failure to recognize the effect of Section 164 of the Companies Act and its incorrect determination of continuous wrongs. The appellants were entitled to costs, and all interim orders were vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>