<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 550 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98519</link>
    <description>For non-notified goods under the Customs Act, the Revenue must prove smuggled character with positive evidence, because the burden under Section 123 does not shift to the claimant. Foreign origin cannot be inferred merely from trade opinion, and the absence of documents showing lawful acquisition does not by itself establish smuggling. On that basis, confiscation and personal penalty were held unsustainable and were set aside, with consequential relief following.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 550 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98519</link>
      <description>For non-notified goods under the Customs Act, the Revenue must prove smuggled character with positive evidence, because the burden under Section 123 does not shift to the claimant. Foreign origin cannot be inferred merely from trade opinion, and the absence of documents showing lawful acquisition does not by itself establish smuggling. On that basis, confiscation and personal penalty were held unsustainable and were set aside, with consequential relief following.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>