<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (2) TMI 69 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98515</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition for amendment, deeming it a routine procedural matter necessary for clarity in the proceedings. The amendment reflected the company&#039;s transition into members&#039; voluntary liquidation and was found to be in compliance with relevant legal provisions. The court dismissed arguments against the amendment, emphasizing its procedural nature and lack of merit in the opposing contentions. No costs were awarded, and the order mandated the execution of the amendment within a fortnight.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:26:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (2) TMI 69 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98515</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition for amendment, deeming it a routine procedural matter necessary for clarity in the proceedings. The amendment reflected the company&#039;s transition into members&#039; voluntary liquidation and was found to be in compliance with relevant legal provisions. The court dismissed arguments against the amendment, emphasizing its procedural nature and lack of merit in the opposing contentions. No costs were awarded, and the order mandated the execution of the amendment within a fortnight.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>