<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 545 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98514</link>
    <description>Reversal of Modvat credit made to enable duty-free imports under Notification No. 204/92-Cus. was treated as valid under the then prevailing DEEC/EXIM regime, and a later change in the EXIM Policy from 1-4-1995 did not retrospectively alter that completed transaction. A subsequent policy or legal change confers no benefit on past transactions unless retrospective effect is expressly provided. On that basis, a refund claim based on the later policy change was not admissible, and rejection of the claim was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:26:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 545 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98514</link>
      <description>Reversal of Modvat credit made to enable duty-free imports under Notification No. 204/92-Cus. was treated as valid under the then prevailing DEEC/EXIM regime, and a later change in the EXIM Policy from 1-4-1995 did not retrospectively alter that completed transaction. A subsequent policy or legal change confers no benefit on past transactions unless retrospective effect is expressly provided. On that basis, a refund claim based on the later policy change was not admissible, and rejection of the claim was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>