<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (10) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98499</link>
    <description>Directors of a private company governed by Table A under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 could not recover remuneration or allowances without approval by the company in general meeting. Table A reserved determination of directors&#039; remuneration to the general meeting, and board management powers did not override that reservation. The Companies Act, 1956 did not remove this requirement for an existing private company: the saving provision continued the applicable Table A regulations, while board powers remained subject to matters reserved for the general meeting. Payments described as salary or expenses were treated as remuneration in substance. The directors&#039; claims were therefore unsustainable and their rejection was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (10) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98499</link>
      <description>Directors of a private company governed by Table A under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 could not recover remuneration or allowances without approval by the company in general meeting. Table A reserved determination of directors&#039; remuneration to the general meeting, and board management powers did not override that reservation. The Companies Act, 1956 did not remove this requirement for an existing private company: the saving provision continued the applicable Table A regulations, while board powers remained subject to matters reserved for the general meeting. Payments described as salary or expenses were treated as remuneration in substance. The directors&#039; claims were therefore unsustainable and their rejection was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>