<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (3) TMI 87 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98494</link>
    <description>A Government company incorporated under the Companies Act remains a separate legal entity, and total Central Government shareholding, appointment of directors, and extensive control do not by themselves make it an industry carried on under the authority of the Central Government for determining the appropriate Government under the Industrial Disputes Act. The appropriate Government was therefore the State Government. Pendency of proceedings for modification of standing orders before the certifying authority does not, by itself, bar a reference of the same matters as industrial disputes under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. Both objections to the reference failed, and the State Government&#039;s reference was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (3) TMI 87 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98494</link>
      <description>A Government company incorporated under the Companies Act remains a separate legal entity, and total Central Government shareholding, appointment of directors, and extensive control do not by themselves make it an industry carried on under the authority of the Central Government for determining the appropriate Government under the Industrial Disputes Act. The appropriate Government was therefore the State Government. Pendency of proceedings for modification of standing orders before the certifying authority does not, by itself, bar a reference of the same matters as industrial disputes under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. Both objections to the reference failed, and the State Government&#039;s reference was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>