<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 632 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98492</link>
    <description>In a confiscation matter involving misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods, the goods were found to differ from the declared description and the importer accepted the enhanced value. The only issue that remained was the quantum of redemption fine and penalty. Considering the totality of facts, including the gap between the declared and assessed values, the amounts originally imposed were found excessive and were reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 632 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98492</link>
      <description>In a confiscation matter involving misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods, the goods were found to differ from the declared description and the importer accepted the enhanced value. The only issue that remained was the quantum of redemption fine and penalty. Considering the totality of facts, including the gap between the declared and assessed values, the amounts originally imposed were found excessive and were reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>