https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98479 In revision under section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, interference lies where a subordinate court's finding is perverse or rests on an erroneous burden of proof, but not with a supported factual finding on liability. The company's suit was held to have been validly instituted because the general manager's authority was backed by a resolution and power of attorney, with the minutes book properly proved. On the merits, the respondent was found not liable for the claimed amount, as the evidence did not establish any real borrowing by him, the payments were shown to have been made by his father, and section 41 of the Contract Act, 1872 did not assist the claimant. en-us Mon, 12 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:32:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98479 In revision under section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, interference lies where a subordinate court's finding is perverse or rests on an erroneous burden of proof, but not with a supported factual finding on liability. The company's suit was held to have been validly instituted because the general manager's authority was backed by a resolution and power of attorney, with the minutes book properly proved. On the merits, the respondent was found not liable for the claimed amount, as the evidence did not establish any real borrowing by him, the payments were shown to have been made by his father, and section 41 of the Contract Act, 1872 did not assist the claimant. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 12 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98479