<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 726 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98476</link>
    <description>Panel boards and PVC cables were treated as capital goods under Rule 57Q because the factual finding was that they were used in the factory for supplying electricity to machines and controlling electricity supply. That finding was not challenged by the Revenue, so the reference could not be converted into a question of law on a different factual basis. The reference application was rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:29:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 726 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98476</link>
      <description>Panel boards and PVC cables were treated as capital goods under Rule 57Q because the factual finding was that they were used in the factory for supplying electricity to machines and controlling electricity supply. That finding was not challenged by the Revenue, so the reference could not be converted into a question of law on a different factual basis. The reference application was rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>