<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 716 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98466</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was restricted to the duty-paying documents specifically prescribed under Rule 57G(2), and gate passes were outside that list except for the limited transitional relaxation validated only where credit was taken on or before 30-6-1994. A board circular concerning a different notification on invoices did not extend that benefit to gate passes in this case. Since the prescribed documentary requirements had to be followed strictly, credit taken after the transitional cut-off on old gate passes was held inadmissible and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 716 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98466</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was restricted to the duty-paying documents specifically prescribed under Rule 57G(2), and gate passes were outside that list except for the limited transitional relaxation validated only where credit was taken on or before 30-6-1994. A board circular concerning a different notification on invoices did not extend that benefit to gate passes in this case. Since the prescribed documentary requirements had to be followed strictly, credit taken after the transitional cut-off on old gate passes was held inadmissible and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>