<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (9) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98458</link>
    <description>The court confirmed the alteration of the memorandum of association, allowing the transfer of the registered office from West Bengal to Maharashtra. It held that the reasons provided for the transfer were valid and commercially sound, emphasizing the shareholders&#039; autonomy in making such decisions. The court rejected the State&#039;s opposition, stating that the State does not have the right to control corporate affairs or challenge shareholder decisions. The judgment highlighted the importance of shareholder autonomy in business decisions and limited the State&#039;s ability to interfere based on speculative economic concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:03:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (9) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98458</link>
      <description>The court confirmed the alteration of the memorandum of association, allowing the transfer of the registered office from West Bengal to Maharashtra. It held that the reasons provided for the transfer were valid and commercially sound, emphasizing the shareholders&#039; autonomy in making such decisions. The court rejected the State&#039;s opposition, stating that the State does not have the right to control corporate affairs or challenge shareholder decisions. The judgment highlighted the importance of shareholder autonomy in business decisions and limited the State&#039;s ability to interfere based on speculative economic concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>