https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98447 The court found in favor of the petitioners, ruling that the 3rd petitioner must be deemed to have been reappointed as a director due to the failure to meet statutory conditions at the adjourned meeting. The court granted various reliefs sought by the petitioners, including an injunction restraining the respondents and directing actions by the respondent-company. The court certified counsel for the case. en-us Thu, 24 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:50:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98447 The court found in favor of the petitioners, ruling that the 3rd petitioner must be deemed to have been reappointed as a director due to the failure to meet statutory conditions at the adjourned meeting. The court granted various reliefs sought by the petitioners, including an injunction restraining the respondents and directing actions by the respondent-company. The court certified counsel for the case. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 24 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98447