<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (8) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98446</link>
    <description>An employee of a Government-owned company does not hold a civil post merely because the company is government-controlled, as a company incorporated under the Companies Act is a separate legal entity distinct from the Government; Article 311 therefore does not apply. Certified standing orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 have statutory force, and disputes about their application or interpretation are to be pursued through the Act&#039;s special machinery, including reference to the Labour Court under Section 13A and industrial dispute remedies. On that basis, writ relief under Article 226 was declined in favour of the available statutory remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:48:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (8) TMI 77 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98446</link>
      <description>An employee of a Government-owned company does not hold a civil post merely because the company is government-controlled, as a company incorporated under the Companies Act is a separate legal entity distinct from the Government; Article 311 therefore does not apply. Certified standing orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 have statutory force, and disputes about their application or interpretation are to be pursued through the Act&#039;s special machinery, including reference to the Labour Court under Section 13A and industrial dispute remedies. On that basis, writ relief under Article 226 was declined in favour of the available statutory remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>