<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98441</link>
    <description>Leave to commence or continue proceedings against a company after a winding-up order requires prior judicial leave and that leave must be obtained while the suit remains within the statutory period of limitation; authorities cited allow leave where it was sought and granted before limitation expired. The court held there is no basis to grant leave to revive or validate a suit once the limitation period has elapsed because that would permit commencement of a time barred action. Outcome: application for leave dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:38:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98441</link>
      <description>Leave to commence or continue proceedings against a company after a winding-up order requires prior judicial leave and that leave must be obtained while the suit remains within the statutory period of limitation; authorities cited allow leave where it was sought and granted before limitation expired. The court held there is no basis to grant leave to revive or validate a suit once the limitation period has elapsed because that would permit commencement of a time barred action. Outcome: application for leave dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>