<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98439</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application seeking to restrain respondents Nos. 2 to 5 from acting as directors, as the Annual General Meeting (AGM) had not commenced, thus allowing respondents to continue in their roles. The court appointed an independent chairman to oversee the AGM to ensure a peaceful and orderly meeting, granting authority to manage the election of directors and proxy votes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:34:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98439</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application seeking to restrain respondents Nos. 2 to 5 from acting as directors, as the Annual General Meeting (AGM) had not commenced, thus allowing respondents to continue in their roles. The court appointed an independent chairman to oversee the AGM to ensure a peaceful and orderly meeting, granting authority to manage the election of directors and proxy votes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>