<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 84 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98433</link>
    <description>Company articles vesting management in the board of directors prevent the general body of shareholders from directly directing or overriding board decisions unless the articles or Companies Act provide otherwise. A shareholder resolution purporting to write off debt does not bind directors exercising their management powers without a valid amendment to the articles. On this basis, enforcement of liability under a jointly executed promissory note remained within the board&#039;s authority, despite the shareholder resolution. The lower appellate decree dismissing the bank&#039;s recovery suit was set aside, and the trial court decree was restored with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:16:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 84 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98433</link>
      <description>Company articles vesting management in the board of directors prevent the general body of shareholders from directly directing or overriding board decisions unless the articles or Companies Act provide otherwise. A shareholder resolution purporting to write off debt does not bind directors exercising their management powers without a valid amendment to the articles. On this basis, enforcement of liability under a jointly executed promissory note remained within the board&#039;s authority, despite the shareholder resolution. The lower appellate decree dismissing the bank&#039;s recovery suit was set aside, and the trial court decree was restored with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>