<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 678 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98431</link>
    <description>A refund claim cannot be used to reopen a duty demand that has already been confirmed in adjudication, upheld on appeal, and paid under the competent authority&#039;s order. Where the assessee contends that the differential duty was wrongly computed, the proper remedy is to challenge that computation in the original proceedings, not through refund proceedings. A concluded determination cannot be indirectly assailed by questioning the earlier calculation in a later refund claim, so the refund claim was held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:14:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=135488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 678 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98431</link>
      <description>A refund claim cannot be used to reopen a duty demand that has already been confirmed in adjudication, upheld on appeal, and paid under the competent authority&#039;s order. Where the assessee contends that the differential duty was wrongly computed, the proper remedy is to challenge that computation in the original proceedings, not through refund proceedings. A concluded determination cannot be indirectly assailed by questioning the earlier calculation in a later refund claim, so the refund claim was held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>