https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98418 The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the respondent, a Government company, is not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The court found no evidence of discrimination or violation of constitutional provisions in the absorption and promotion processes. Additionally, procedural and factual barriers hindered the success of the application, as it would disrupt the company's administration and affect numerous individuals. The appeal was dismissed without costs due to the unsuitability of the claims for writ jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 30 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:16:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98418 The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the respondent, a Government company, is not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The court found no evidence of discrimination or violation of constitutional provisions in the absorption and promotion processes. Additionally, procedural and factual barriers hindered the success of the application, as it would disrupt the company's administration and affect numerous individuals. The appeal was dismissed without costs due to the unsuitability of the claims for writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 30 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=98418